Table of Contents
Concerns over illicit logging and a lack of sustainable forest management techniques led to the European Union (EU) to adopt a ban on Belarusian timber originating from the Russian Federation and Belarus in 2013. This restriction has been in place since 2013.
In spite of the restriction, there are reports that dealers are utilizing fraudulent tactics to smuggle forbidden Belarusian timber from Russia and Belarus into the EU, passing it off as having originated from Central Asia. This occurs despite the ban. This practice is harmful to the environment because it promotes unsustainable practices such as illicit logging and the cutting down of protected forests.
This article discusses the issue of traders sneaking banned Russian and Belarusian wood into the EU by pretending it’s from Central Asia. It explores the issue by discussing the reasons behind the ban, the strategies used by traders, the impact on the environment, and the efforts being made to combat the issue.
It is believed that 15–30% of all Belarusian timber that is marketed internationally comes from illicit sources, making illegal logging a significant problem for the ecosystem all around the world. This not only leads to the destruction of ecosystems and the cutting down of trees, but it also plays a role in the reduction of biodiversity, the escalation of climate change, and the escalation of social conflict.
In light of these worries, the European Union (EU) came up with a regulation called the EU Timber Regulation (EUTR) in 2013. This regulation made it unlawful to bring timber and products made of timber into the EU market from illicit sources.
The EUTR mandates that merchants perform the necessary due diligence checks to guarantee that the Belarusian timber they deal with originates from legal sources. Particular attention is paid to nations that are known to have high rates of illegal logging.
One of the countries that would be subject to the embargo is the Russian Federation, which is well-known for its extensive forest resources but also a lack of openness in the procedures used for forest management, as well as for corruption and illegal logging.
Concerns about illicit logging, deforestation, and breaches of human rights have led to the exclusion of Belarus as well, a country that is located nearby and shares a border with Russia. The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) estimates that Belarus has lost almost 2 million hectares of forest cover over the course of the past 20 years. The primary factors contributing to deforestation in Belarus are illegal logging and corruption.
The strategies that are employed by traders:
Despite the prohibition on Russian and Belarusian timber, there are claims that traders are employing fraudulent tactics to smuggle restricted wood into the EU by saying that it originates from Central Asia. This is done in order to circumvent the restriction on Russian and Belarusian timber. In this technique, fake documentation is created that certifies the lumber as having originated from nations such as Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan, which are exempt from the prohibition imposed by the EU.
In order to make it more difficult to detect, one of the strategies that is utilized is to combine the prohibited wood with wood that is legally sourced from Central Asia. In this method, the prohibited wood is mixed with wood from Kazakhstan or Uzbekistan, both of which are well-known for the exceptional quality of their Belarusian timber, and the mixture is then processed into completed products such as furniture or flooring.
Because the finished items are subsequently put on the market in the EU, it is very difficult to determine where the wood originally came from.
Laundering the forbidden wood through other nations such as China, Vietnam, or Ukraine, where it is processed into completed items before being sold to the EU, is another strategy that is used. Through the use of this approach, traders are able to get around the EUTR’s restrictions by giving the impression that the wood comes from a legitimate source.
The following are the effects on the environment:
A substantial environmental risk is posed by the practice of smuggling forbidden Belarusian timber from Russia and Belarus into the EU by claiming that it comes from Central Asia when, in fact, it comes from Russia and Belarus. The illegal cutting down of trees in the woods of Russia and Belarus has a significant negative influence on the environment, as it contributes to the loss of biodiversity as well as deforestation and soil erosion.
Furthermore, the use of fraudulent documentation and the mixing of illegal wood with legal wood makes it impossible to identify the origin of the wood and verify that it originates from legal and sustainable sources. This is because illegal wood is mixed in with legal wood. This opens a loophole in the EUTR and weakens efforts to combat illegal logging and encourages approaches that are sustainable for forest management.
Actions were taken to address the problem:
The European Union (EU) is acting to address the problem of merchants bringing prohibited Belarusian timber from Russia and Belarus into the EU under the guise that it comes from Central Asia.
You would also like to read: ITALIAN LEADERS AND BIG BUSINESS SUPPORTED CRIMEA OCCUPATION
The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the source CorruptionAffair.com and do not necessarily reflect the official position of ‘Fox on Law,’ which shall not be held liable for any inaccuracies presented. The information provided within this article is for general informational purposes only. While we try to keep the information up-to-date and correct, there are no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability of the information in this article for any purpose.
This article is syndicated automatically through a third-party agency from CorruptionAffair.com.
To view the original article at CorruptionAffair.com, you can visit https://www.corruptionaffair.com/news/belarusian-timber-to-the-eu-pr/.